Historical background of the legal literature and case law discussion on the admission of pain and suffering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70640/rdclaeh.4.4.12Keywords:
Pain and suffering, Legal hermeneutics, Compensable damages, Admissibility, Civil liabilityAbstract
This case law commentary aims to highlight some historical precedents of positive law that have been fundamental in the acceptance of pain and suffering in Uruguayan civil law at legal literature and case law levels, such as section 1345 of the Civil Code that was used in the legal literature discussions of the first half of the 20th Century, whose argumentative value may not be ignored.
Downloads
References
Aramendía José Pedro (1945), «La reparación pecuniaria del daño moral en doctrina y nuestro Código Civil», Revista La Justicia Uruguaya, Tomo 10, Montevideo, Ed.: La Justicia Uruguaya.
Armaud Ugón (1940), caso 168 [que identifica la sentencia dictada 27/12/1935], en La Justicia Uruguaya, Tomo I, Montevideo, Ed.: La Justicia Uruguaya.
Abadie-Santos A. R. (1930), Jurisprudencia, «Colección de la Alta Corte de Justicia», Tomo VI, 2ª edición, Montevideo, Ed.: El siglo ilustrado, caso 2282 del 05 de octubre de 1917.
Amézaga Juan José (2011), «Estudios esenciales», Ed.: La Ley, Montevideo.
Stewart Vargas G. (1932), La Revista de Derecho, Jurisprudencia y Administración, Tomo 34, Montevideo, Ed.: La Revista de Derecho, Jurisprudencia y Administración.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
